Image created by AI
In a move that underscores the complexities of urban development and social equity, the City of Cape Town has announced an extension of the public comment period concerning the future of the old Woodstock Hospital site. This decision came about following a meeting with the Woodstock Residents’ Association where the voices of multiple stakeholders were heard, reflecting a community divided yet deeply engaged with the site's future.
Originally slated for closure by the end of November, the comment period will now close at the end of January 2025, giving more citizens a chance to influence the decision-making process about the site currently known as Cissie Gool House. This site has become a symbol of resistance and shelter for nearly 900 individuals and families who, since 2017, have occupied the building after being displaced from their homes in Woodstock—a district experiencing rapid gentrification.
The City has earmarked the property, valued at R87-million, for a significant redevelopment into a mixed-use area featuring around 500 residential units, both in the open market and as social housing. This plan, however, has sparked a debate on the possible displacement of current occupants, who include many vulnerable groups such as women-led households and the elderly, who could face homelessness if the redevelopment proceeds without a careful, inclusive approach.
Residents like Ashura Easton and others at Cissie Gool House have publicly voiced their willingness to contribute to utility costs and integrate fully into the community, indicating a preference for solutions that would regularise their status rather than evict them. On the other side, residents like Thurlo Mckie see the potential sale and development as a boon for property values and local economic development, showcasing the diverse opinions within the community.
Amidst these discussions, advocacy groups such as Reclaim the City have urged the City to adopt an incremental development approach. By doing so, they argue, the city could prevent displacement and recognize the role of such occupations in addressing housing shortages in a context-sensitive manner.
In response to the ongoing dialogue, Carl Pophaim, the mayco member for human settlements, expressed enthusiasm about the active public engagement and the breadth of constructive feedback received. Pophaim emphasized that the City is committed to further engaging with the residents to explore all possible options and ensure that every household's needs are considered in the final plans for the site.
As the deadline for public comments approaches, the future of the old Woodstock Hospital remains in the balance, with city officials, residents, and activists eagerly awaiting a resolution that balances development with dignity and inclusivity.