Image created by AI

NPA Firm on Opposing Speaker's Interdict to Escape Arrest Amid Bribery Allegations

Published March 25, 2024
2 years ago


In a legal standoff that echoes through the halls of South African governance, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has firmly stated its intention to oppose an urgent application by the Speaker of Parliament to secure an interdict that would prevent her imminent arrest. The speaker, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, finds herself at the center of controversy following allegations of bribery linked to her time as the Minister of Defence.


The situation escalated when the NPA's Investigative Directorate (ID) conducted a raid on Mapisa-Nqakula's Johannesburg residence, leading to the speaker taking what has been described as "special leave." Subsequent developments have spotlighted the gravity of the accusations, with the state alleging the receipt of R2.3 million in bribes from a defence contractor.


Adding to Mapisa-Nqakula's woes, the Democratic Alliance (DA), a major opposition party, has initiated a motion of no confidence against her in the National Assembly. Chief Whip of the DA, Siviwe Gwarube, has not only called for Mapisa-Nqakula's resignation but has also commenced efforts to rally support from other political factions within the legislature to enforce the speaker's removal under Section 52(4) of the South African Constitution.


Highlighting the procedural discrepancies, Gwarube has turned the spotlight on the parliamentary rules, which do not acknowledge 'special leave' taken unilaterally by a member. Under the National Assembly rules, such leave must be sanctioned by a formal motion within a full sitting of the House, a process that was evidently circumvented in this instance.


The legal battle is set to ensue at the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria, where the Speaker seeks to prevent the NPA's ID from proceeding with her arrest. Advocate Mthunzu Mhaga, the NPA national spokesperson, has dismissed the application as "baseless" and lacking in merit, signaling the authority's readiness to challenge the interdict tooth and nail.


South Africa, where the rule of law is a foundational principle of its democratic ethos, is witnessing an assertive stance from its judicial bodies against alleged corruption amongst its highest officials. As the country's citizens look on, the outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for accountability and the unyielding pursuit of justice.



Leave a Comment

Rate this article:

Please enter email address.
Looks good!
Please enter your name.
Looks good!
Please enter a message.
Looks good!
Please check re-captcha.
Looks good!
Leave the first review