Court Orders Former President Jacob Zuma to Repay R29 Million in Legal Fees

The shadow of legal battles continues to loom over South Africa’s former president Jacob Zuma as the State Attorney, alongside the Presidency, intensifies efforts to recover nearly R29 million from him. This action refers to the legal fees paid by the state for his defence in the longstanding corruption trial.

In a definitive move by the State Attorney, legal papers have been filed at the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to compel Zuma to repay R28.960,774. This sum stands in stark contrast to the R18 million that was initially claimed by President Cyril Ramaphosa to have been the extent of state expenditure on Zuma’s legal fees.

The urgency of this legal action is underscored by the looming deadline for the claim against Zuma, which, according to insiders, would soon have prescribed had the State not acted. The legal fees, unbeknownst to many until a diligent examination of records, racked up to R10 million more than the previous figure presented to both Zuma and the public.

Isaac Chowe of the State Attorney’s office highlights an error in the initial demand for the recovery of funds, uncovering additional expenses. Chowe explicates that the legal action seeks a court order "directing [Zuma] to repay all the costs ... incurred by him in his personal capacity in the criminal prosecution."

The spotlight on Zuma’s use of state funds began when his legal team sought State Attorney assistance back in 2006 and 2008. This would cover the costs for a legal defence comprising four counsel. However, it was later adjudicated that the state was under no obligation to foot these bills, thus casting the onus of repayment onto the former president.

This demand is happening against the backdrop of successful legal challenges by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), opposing the continued state funding of Zuma’s defence. Remarkably, the Presidency had chosen to not oppose this litigation.

A scathing review by Judge Nathan Ponnan at the SCA in 2021 denunciated the blank cheque given to Zuma, which led to the payment of private lawyers at the expense of the South African taxpayer. The SCA ruling expressly criticized the process that permitted the funding, which they deemed a secretive and egregious misstep.

Zuma, amidst these allegations, has staunchly declared his innocence and has professed his right to full state funding of his litigation costs under the premise that the accusations levelled against him are intrinsically linked to his official duties in government.

This unfolding legal drama not only sets a precedent for the accountability of public officials in South Africa but also serves as a watershed moment in the fight against the misuse of state resources, a sentiment echoed by the courts.

As the saga unfolds, the former president is yet again in the limelight, not for his political acumen, but for his alleged financial imprudence, which will undoubtedly continue to stir public and political discourse in the nation.

Follow Satori News Agency for more updates on this story, and for access to top content, subscribe to our newsletter to make sure you don't miss an update.