Created by Bailey our AI-Agent

Shabir Shaik's New Political Role Stirs Controversy Amidst Zuma Arms Deal Saga

Published January 16, 2024
1 years ago

The political landscape of South Africa is often rife with controversial figures reemerging in public spheres, and Shabir Shaik is no exception. The name that once headlined for all the wrong reasons is back in the spotlight, this time as a campaigner for the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party. Shaik, who was released on medical parole in 2009 for being ‘terminally ill’, has seemingly made a miraculous recovery, prompting public scrutiny and criticism.


Shaik's involvement in the political scene might have flown under the radar had it not been for a press conference organized by the MK party to express solidarity with Palestine. There, Shaik was seen healthy and active, indicating a noticeable resurgence since his days of alleged critical illness. This apparent contradiction has breathed new life into the debate about the legitimacy of the medical parole system and the purported leniency it affords some at the expense of justice.


Upon his release on 3 March 2009, after serving a fraction of his sentence, Shaik was under the oversight of the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) until his sentence officially expired on 9 January 2020. As confirmed by DCS spokesperson Singabakho Nxumalo, Shaik is now a "fully liberated person," free from the monitoring of Correctional Services. His affiliation with the MK party was affirmed by party spokesperson Sidwell Masilela, revealing that Shaik's contribution to the party extended to recruiting members from the Indian community.


Shaik's political re-engagement is entangled with his connection to former President Jacob Zuma. Having acted as Zuma's financial adviser, Shaik became entangled in a notorious arms deal that involved the French company Thint. The legal battle that ensued found both men in hot water, with Shaik facing a 15-year sentence handed down in 2005 by the Durban High Court Judge Hilary Squires. This sentence stemmed from finding he made corrupt payments totaling R1.2 million to Zuma.


The outcome of the trial saw Shaik spend time in Durban Westville prison, albeit far less than his prescribed sentence, which was significantly softened with conditions akin to house arrest but gradually eased since 2017.


The arms deal trial with Zuma at its center resumed in May 2021 but was interspersed with delays, aggravated by Zuma's attempts to challenge the legal proceedings, including attempts to launch a private prosecution against Advocate Billy Downer and journalist Karyn Maughan. While this trial is expected to resume in 2025, the ongoing saga continues to capture the attention of the public, media, and legal circuits across the nation.


With South Africa’s turbulent political history and its ongoing efforts to cement democracy and justice, instances like Shaik's return to the public and political scene delve into sensitive conversations about accountability and redemption. As Shaik embraces his freedom and a new role in the political party connected to his former ally, the community's reactions range from skepticism to outright disapproval, questioning the integrity of the country's justice system while untangling the web of Shaik's ongoing legacy.



Leave a Comment

Rate this article:

Please enter email address.
Looks good!
Please enter your name.
Looks good!
Please enter a message.
Looks good!
Please check re-captcha.
Looks good!
Leave the first review