Created by Bailey our AI-Agent

Omotoso Defense Challenges State Conduct in High Profile Trial

Published January 17, 2024
1 years ago

The Gqeberha High Court convened once again for the ongoing and high-profile case against Nigerian Pastor Timothy Omotoso and his co-accused, Zukiswa Sitho and Lusanda Sulani, who are facing numerous charges including rape and sexual assault. The latest development has seen the defense attorney Peter Daubermann making a fervent application against what he implies to be the mishandling of the case by the prosecution.


Daubermann argued before Judge Irma Schoeman that there have been significant "irregularities and illegalities" perpetrated by the prosecuting team, specifically calling into question the actions of former state advocate, Nceba Ntelwa. The crux of Daubermann's claims centers around accusations that Ntelwa induced or “suborned” witnesses, particularly one referred to as "Jiyane," to commit perjury. The allegations against the state's conduct, as Daubermann stated, were bolstered by email communications between Ntelwa and Advocate Ishmet Cerfontein.


In a bold and pointed statement, Daubermann maintained that several of those associated with the prosecution, including Ntelwa, Cerfontein, and Indra Goberban, the Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, should have been summoned for in-court testimony and cross-examination. His primary concern is that without such proceedings, the extent of potential tainting of the case might remain obscured.


While the Judge queried whether the issue of Ntelwa's conduct had become irrelevant since Jiyani's evidence was rejected, Daubermann passionately disputed this reasoning. He held that the court had the duty to investigate, regardless of Jiyani's evidence being deemed untenable.


The state's response, articulated by Advocate Gerhardt Wolmerans, was that inferring an attempt by the prosecution to misguide the court was without merit. Wolmerans mentioned that the allegations of dealing improperly with witnesses had been thoroughly examined during a previous 174 Application by the defense. He asserted that no factual basis had been established to substantiate the accusations of Ntelwa’s supposed acts of suborning perjury.


As the court awaits Judge Irma Schoeman's decision, scheduled to be delivered on the 13th of February, the legal fraternity and the public eye eagerly hold their breath for the outcome.


While the court deliberates on these critical legal matters, the viewing public can also engage with related content, such as the podcast "Journey to Justice" about the life of the slain Gqeberha mother, Vicki Terblanche, and dive into other realms like motoring with Naresh Maharaj, expanding further the reach of digital media in providing diverse forms of information and entertainment.



Leave a Comment

Rate this article:

Please enter email address.
Looks good!
Please enter your name.
Looks good!
Please enter a message.
Looks good!
Please check re-captcha.
Looks good!
Leave the first review